User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad compatibility; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; HW iPad2,2; de_de) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) (AdMob-iSDK-20100614; iphoneos4.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AppleiPad2,2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.234 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 525.18.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 4.3.3AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 4.3AppleiPad 2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 4.3.3closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView closeiOS 4.3.3AppleiPad2,2closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 4.3.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 525.18.1iOS 4.3.3AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525.18.1iOS 4.3.3AppleiPad 2tabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:30 | by ThaDafinser