User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; PaperLiBot/2.1; http://support.paper.li/entries/20023257-what-is-paper-li)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-149.php
yesPaper.li BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesPaper.li BotBot/Crawler0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesPaperLiBot/2.1close0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesPaperLiBotSearch bot0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesPaperLiBotclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:29 | by ThaDafinser