User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone 5_1_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/7E18 Grindr/1.8.8 (iPod3,1/5.1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AppleiPod3,1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.224 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 528.18closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS AppleiPod Touch 3portable media playeryes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X closeiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPod3,1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.10101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 528.18iOS AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 528.18iOS AppleiPod touch (3rd gen)mediayescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1.1closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:29 | by ThaDafinser