User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; DNS_S4008 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.39 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 37.0Android 4.2unknown DNSS4008Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.2DNSS4008Mobile Phoneyesyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.39closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 37.0.2062.39closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 37.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.39closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 37.0.2062closeAndroid 4.2.2DNS_S4008closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.39WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 37Blink Android 4.2.2DNSS4008mobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.39closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:29 | by ThaDafinser