User agent detail

User-Agent: Mozilla/1.0N (X11; SunOS 4.1.1 sun4c)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
Netscape Navigator 1.0Solaris 1.0 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneric CrawlerBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
User-Agent closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 1.0closeSolaris 1.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Solaris 4.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.0NcloseSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 1.0N SunOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 1.0 Solaris 1.0desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:29 | by ThaDafinser