User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; FreeTAB 7001 HD IC Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 37.0Android 4.4unknown MODECOMFreeTAB 7001 HD ICTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.4MODECOMFreeTAB 7001 HD ICTabletyesyes0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.26803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.4tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2062closeAndroid 4.4.2ModecomFreeTAB 7001 HD ICcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.117WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 37Blink Android 4.4.2ModecomFreeTAB 7001 HD ICtabletyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:28 | by ThaDafinser