User agent detail

GetJarSDK/20130302.04 (8) com.miniclip.railrush/24 android/4.3 (asus; WW_epad; K00E)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AsusWW Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
GetJarSDK 20130302.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close KyoceraK00Emobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.3AsusFonepad 7phabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close AsusWWcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
KyoceraK00Emobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:28 | by ThaDafinser