User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20120322 Fedora/3.6.17-1.nk.2oem.1 Firefox/3.6.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.6.17Fedora Gecko 1.9.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.243 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.17closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Fedora 3.6desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.17closeFedora 3.6.17closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.17Gecko 20120322Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.455 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.17Gecko 1.9.2Fedora desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.17closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:27 | by ThaDafinser