User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; en_US) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dreamweaver/12.0.0.5808 Version/5.0.3 Safari/533.19.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Dreamweaver 12.0Win32 unknownunknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dreamweaver 12.0WebKit Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0.3closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.24 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit Windows desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.0.3closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.033 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.0.3WebKit 533.19.4Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.0.3Webkit 533.19.4Windows desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0.3closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0.3closeen_US Desktopcloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:27 | by ThaDafinser