User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Intel Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/538.1 debian/unstable (3.8.2-5) Epiphany/3.8.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Epiphany 3.8.2Debian WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.211 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 3.8.2closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 3.8WebKit Debian desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.8.2closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 3.8.2closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.081 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 3.8.2WebKit 538.1Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 3.8.2Webkit 538.1OS X desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:27 | by ThaDafinser