User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; iris504Q Build/iris504Q) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.166 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.166Android 4.2.1Blink LavaIris 504Qsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.2.1LavaIris 504qmobile-browseryescloseclose0.263 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.2LavaIris 504Qsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.2.1LavaIris 504Qcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 504closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.2.1LavaIris 504Qmobile:smartyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.2LavaIris 504qSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:27 | by ThaDafinser