User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) coc_coc_browser/49.0 Chrome/43.0.2357.126_coc_coc Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-687.php
Coc Coc Browser 49.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Coc Coc Browser 49.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.126closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.126closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Coc Coc 49.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.126_coc_coccloseWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2357closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.126.coc.coccloseWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.126WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.126closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:26 | by ThaDafinser