User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/535.22+ (KHTML, like Gecko) WebKitGTK+/1.8.1 luakit
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
luakit 1.8Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
luakit 1.8WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 535.22closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
LuaKit closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 535.22Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.496 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LuaKit Webkit 535.22Linux closeclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:26 | by ThaDafinser