User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows Phone OS 7.5; Trident/3.1; IEMobile/7.0; Xbox)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MicrosoftXbox Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.0Trident 3.1WinPhone Mobile Phoneyesyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows 7.5MicrosoftXbox 360mobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.0Trident Windows Phone 7.5MicrosoftXbox 360consoleyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.5MicrosoftXboxcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.183 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone MicrosoftXBox 360closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 3.1 MicrosoftXbox 360gaming:consolecloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Xbox 360 7.0closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 7.5MicrosoftXbox 360Smart-TVcloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:26 | by ThaDafinser