User agent detail

Opera Mini 4/SonyEricssonK800iv/R1ED Browser/NetFront/3.3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonK800iv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.3NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.3closeJVM AccessNetFront Ver. 3.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.275 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.3NetFront Sony EricssonK800ivfeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini SonyEricssonK800ivclose closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.3close SonyEricssonK800ivcloseclosecloseclose0.108 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini Sony EricssonSony Ericsson K800ivcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.3 Sony EricssonK800ivmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.3close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.3Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:25 | by ThaDafinser