User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux like Android; en_US) AppleWebKit/534.34 PocketBook/624 (screen 600x800; FW W624.4.4.468) Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/ereader/pocketbook.yaml
Webkit 534.34PocketBookBasic Touchereaderyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Pocket Internet Explorer 5.0 (Linux like Android; en_US) AppleWebKitcloseAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 534.34Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.34 PocketBookBasic Touchereaderyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:25 | by ThaDafinser