User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Cygwin) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) konqueror/4.13.3 Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.13.3 Webkit 534.34desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.13.3close desktop-browsercloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.13WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.13.3close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.166 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.13.3WebKit 534.34Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.13.3Webkit 534.34 desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:25 | by ThaDafinser