User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-au; KFAPWI Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.11 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Silk 3.11Android unknownunknown AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.11WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9Tabletyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.25 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.11Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9" WiFitabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.11closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.086 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.11WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.461 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.11Webkit 535.19FireOS 3AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9"tabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.1closeAndroid AmazonKFAPWITabletyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:24 | by ThaDafinser