User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Linux Ventana; xx; Transformer TF101 Build/HTJ85B) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/8.0 Safari/534.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Android 3.2Webkit AsusEee Pad Transformertabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 8.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.056 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 8.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.248 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 8.0WebKit GNU/Linux AsusTransformer TF101tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 8.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 8.0closeLinux AsusTransformer TF101closeclosecloseclose0.024 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 8.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.091 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 8.0WebKit 534.13Linux AsusAsus Transformer Pad TF101closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit Android 3.2AsusEee Pad Transformertabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 8.0closeLinux AsusTF101Tabletyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:24 | by ThaDafinser