User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) WhiteHat Aviator/37.0.2062.99 Chrome/37.0.2062.99 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
WhiteHat Aviator 37.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
WhiteHat Aviator 37.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2062closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.086 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.99WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.434 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Aviator 37Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:24 | by ThaDafinser