User agent detail

TurnitinBot/3.0 (http://www.turnitin.com/robot/crawlerinfo.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesTurnitinBotBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
TurnitinBot 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesTurnitinBotCrawler0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesTurnitinBotclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesTurnitinBotCrawler0.169 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:24 | by ThaDafinser