User agent detail

iMangaX/3.0.5 CFNetwork/548.0.4 Darwin/11.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
CFNetwork 0.0iOS 5.0unknown Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit iOS 5.0AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
iMangaX 3.0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeiOS 5.0.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.209 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iOS 5.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 548.0.4closeiOS 5.0.1Applecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iOS 5.0.1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.0closeiOS 5.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:24 | by ThaDafinser