User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru; Effect Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/9.9.1.554 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.9Android 4.2unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.9WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.287 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.9WebKit Android 4.2yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.9.1closeAndroid 4.2.2Effectcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.084 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.9.1.554WebKit 528.5Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.9Webkit 528.5Android 4.2.2Effectmobile:smartyescloseclose0.077 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:23 | by ThaDafinser