User agent detail

LG-CU6160/1.0 UP.Browser/4.1.26l
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGCU6160 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-CU6160 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26lclose LGCU6160mobile-browseryescloseclose0.203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGCU6160smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.26close LGCU6160closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26l LGLGCU6160closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 LGCU6160mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGCU6160Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:23 | by ThaDafinser