User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (S60V3; U; ru; NOKIA6650 fold)/UC Browser8.2.0.132/28/444/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6650 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.087 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Symbian OS Series 60 V3Nokia6650smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser UCcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeSymbian OS Nokia6650closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.111 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.132 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Series60 3Nokia6650 foldmobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:22 | by ThaDafinser