User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.9; es-es; HTC ONE X+ Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) CrMo/16.0.912.75 Mobile Safari/535.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCONE X+ Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 16.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.209 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 535.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 16.0.912.75closeAndroid 4.1.9GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.287 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 16.0WebKit Android 4.1HTCONE X+smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.9closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 16.0.912closeAndroid 4.1.9HTCONE X+closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.9closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 16.0.912.75WebKit 535.7Android 4.1.9HTC Onecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.369 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Beta 16.0.912.75Webkit 535.7Android 4.0.3HTCOne X+mobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.75closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.049 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:21 | by ThaDafinser