User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Nintendo WiiU) AppleWebKit/534.53 (KHTML, like Gecko) NWF/1.2.0.USA
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/nintendo.yaml
Webkit 534.53NintendoWii Ugaming:console Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront NX WebKit NintendoWiiUConsoleyes0.064 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.53closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nintendo WiiNintendoWiiUconsoleyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close NintendoWii Ucloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.53 NintendoNintendo WiiUcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.472 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nintendo Web Framework 1.2Webkit 534.53 NintendoWii Ugaming:consolecloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Nintendo Wii U closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NintendoWii USmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:21 | by ThaDafinser