User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.2; ru; HTC_Desire_310) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.0.419 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.2Android 4.2unknown HTCDesire 310Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 Android 4.2HTCDesire 310Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close HTCA510emobile-browseryescloseclose0.261 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 Android 4.2HTCDesire 310smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeAndroid 4.2.2HTCDesire 310closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.082 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.419 HTC Desire 310closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Android 4.2.2HTCDesire 310mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:20 | by ThaDafinser