User agent detail

JUC(Linux;U;Android2.2.2;Zh_cn;HUAWEI-M835;240*320;)UCWEB7.8.0.95/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiM835 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid 2.2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Android HuaweiM835smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeAndroid 2.2.2HuaweiM835closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8 Android 2.2.2HuaweiM835mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:20 | by ThaDafinser