User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.4; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2188.2 Safari/537.36 OPR/27.0.1670.0 (Edition developer)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Opera 27.0Win10 6.4unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 27.0Blink Win10 6.4Windows DesktopDesktop0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 27.0.1670.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 27.0.1670.0closeWindows 6.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.213 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 27.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 27.0.1670.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 27.0.1670closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 40.0.2188.2closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.095 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 27.0.1670.0WebKit 537.36Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Developer 27.0Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 27.0.1670.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 27.0.1689.22closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:20 | by ThaDafinser