User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 4.0; rv:25.4) Gecko/20150509 Firefox/31.9 PaleMoon/25.4.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
PaleMoon 25.4WinNT 4.025.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 25.4Gecko 25.0WinNT 4.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 31.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 25.4.1closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 25.4Gecko Windows NTdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 31.9closeWindows NT 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 25.4.1closeWindows NT 4.0 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 25.4.1closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 25.4.1Gecko 20150509Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose3.656 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 25.4.1Gecko 25.4Windows NT 4.0desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 31.9closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 31.9closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.08 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:20 | by ThaDafinser