User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; InfoPath.2; MSOffice 14)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Outlook 2010 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Outlook 2010Trident 4.0WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Outlook 2010 closeWindows 6.0email-clientcloseclose0.219 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Outlook 2010closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Microsoft Office 14Trident 4.0Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:19 | by ThaDafinser