User agent detail

TCL J706T_TD/1.0 Linux/3.4.5 Android/4.1.2 Release/08.27.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 baiduboxapp/4.2 (Baidu; P1 4.1.2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Android Browser Android 4.1.2WebKit TCLJ706Tsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
TCL closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2TCLJ706Tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.304 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1TCLJ706Tsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.1.2closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.2TCLJ706Tmobile:smartyescloseclose0.12201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:18 | by ThaDafinser