User agent detail

Tagged/3.9.7/an LG-E610v(lge/m4_vdf_com/m4:4.0.3/IML74K/lge610v-V10g.20130211.093327:user/release-keys)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGE610v Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Tagged 3.9.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGE610v(lgemobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGE610vsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGE610vcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGE610vcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGE610v(lgemobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:17 | by ThaDafinser