User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; HTC T329d Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.136 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 33.0Android 4.0unknown HTCDesire XCMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.0HTCDesire XCMobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.0.4HTCT328wmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.0HTCT329dsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.0.4HTCT329dcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.092 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.0.4HTCT329dmobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.0HTCT329dSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:17 | by ThaDafinser