User agent detail

stamhub 1.7.0(MD02, 1113513)/SGH-T999; 606; 1.7.0(MD02, 1113513); com.samsung.mediahub; d2tmo; samsung/d2tmo/d2tmo:4.1.2/JZO54K/T999UVDMD5:user/release-keys
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungmediahub Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
stamhub closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Samsung.mediahub; d2tmo; samsungmobile-browseryescloseclose0.203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungSGH-T999smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Samsungmediahubcloseclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SamsungGalaxy S IIIcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung.mediahub; d2tmo; samsungmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:17 | by ThaDafinser