User agent detail

Nokia1681c/2.0 (06.82) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia1681c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia1681c 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Nokia1681cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia1681csmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia1681ccloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 1681ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia1681cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia1681cFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:16 | by ThaDafinser