User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-B2710/B2710POJK3 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/2.0 QTV/5.3 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-dolfin.yaml
Dolfin 2.0 SamsungXcover 271mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0SamsungGT-B2710Mobile Phoneyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-B2710 B2710POJK3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0close SamsungGT-B2710mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 2.0WebKit SamsungGT-B2710smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0close SamsungGT-B2710closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.28 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0 SamsungXcover 271mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-B2710Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:16 | by ThaDafinser