User agent detail

LG-L3100 MIC/WAP2.0 MIDP-2.0/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGL3100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA LGL3100Mobile Phoneyes0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-L3100 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGL3100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGL3100smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGL3100closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGL3100closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGL3100mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGL3100Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:16 | by ThaDafinser