User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; WinXP; x86) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2049.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-windows.yaml
Chrome Dev 37.0.2049.0Windows XPBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2049closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.089 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2049.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 37.0.2049.0Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:16 | by ThaDafinser