User agent detail

avast/1.0.6913 (6913;de_DE) ID/3e89b6e05f804a19 HW/HTC EVO 3D X515m Android/4.0.3 (IML74K)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCEVO 3D X515m Android Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
avast 1.0.6913closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCEVO 3Dmobile-browseryescloseclose0.261 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0HTCEVO 3Dsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCEVO 3D X515m Androidcloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.432 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.3HTCEVO 3Dmobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.059 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:16 | by ThaDafinser