User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; U25GT-C4W Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2490.76 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-851.php
Chrome 46.0Android 4.4unknown CubeU25GT-C4WTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 46.0Blink Android 4.4CubeU25GT-C4WTabletyesyes0.057 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.252 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 46.0Blink Android 4.4CubeU25GT-C4Wtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 46.0.2490closeAndroid 4.4.2CubeU25GT-C4Wcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.76WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 46Blink Android 4.4.2CubeU25GT C4Wtabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 46closeAndroid 4.4CubeU25GTTabletyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:15 | by ThaDafinser