User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (BREW; U; 3.1.5; en) AppleWebKit/528.28 (KHTML, like Gecko) OBIGO/W10.1 Safari/528.5 480X800 LGE VX11000
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGVX11000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 528.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 528.5close desktop-browsercloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo W10WebKit Brew LGVX11000smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 10.1closeBREW LGVX11000closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.149 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo W10 Browser W10WebKit 528.28a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo W 10.1Webkit 528.28Brew 3.1.5LGEnv Touchmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:15 | by ThaDafinser