User agent detail

RebelMouse/0.1 Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; http://rebelmouse.com) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
RebelMouse unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknown Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
RebelMouse 0.1Gecko 0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 7.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox close desktop-browsercloseclose0.198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 7.0Gecko 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 7.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 7.0.1close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 7.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.105 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 7.0.1Gecko 20100101 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 7.0.1Gecko desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 7.0.1closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 7.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:15 | by ThaDafinser