User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.3; en-us; ERIS ADR6200 Build/GRI40) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCERIS ADR6200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.3GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.271 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCADR6200smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.3closeAndroid 2.3.3HTCERIS ADR6200closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.21 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.3ERIS ADR6200mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.051 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:14 | by ThaDafinser