User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (MOT-XT800/TITA_M2_16.22.7;U;Android/2.1-update1;480*854;CTC/2.0) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
Android Browser Android 2.1Webkit 530.17MotorolaMOTO XT800mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.268 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1MotorolaXT800smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid 2.1.0MotorolaXT800closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1-update1closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 530.17Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.418 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1MotorolaMOTO XT800mobile:smartyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:14 | by ThaDafinser