User agent detail

mozilla/5.0 (linux; android 4.2.2; mismart wink ;) build/jdq39) applewebkit/537.36 (khtml, like gecko) chrome/32.0.1700.99 mobile safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700.99Android 4.2.2Blink WoldermiSmart wink ;)smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.125 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid FLYIQ4401mobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 32.0Blink Android 4.2WoldermiSmart wink ;)smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeandroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.138 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.36 closeclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:14 | by ThaDafinser