User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; zh-cn; DESAY TS808 Build/MocorDroid2.3.5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/5.1 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
QQ Browser 5.1MocorDroid 2.3.5WebKit DesayTS808smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.256 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.1WebKit MocorDroid 2.3DesayTS808smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.1closeAndroid 2.3.5DESAY TS808closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.193 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.1WebKit 537.36Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.1Webkit 537.36Android 2.3.5DesayTS808mobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:13 | by ThaDafinser