User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1; en-us; NOOK BNRV350 Build/ERD79) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/ereader/nook.yaml
Android Browser Android 2.1Webkit 530.17Barnes & NobleNOOK Simple Touchereaderyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.059 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.1GenericAndroid 2.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.251 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1Barnes & NobleNook BNRV350tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1NOOK BNRV350closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.15 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 530.17Android 2.1Nook eReadercloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.366 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1Barnes & NobleNOOK Simple Touchereaderyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:13 | by ThaDafinser