User agent detail

insfx4heise heise.de Version/2.2 (Google; Android/4.0.3; LENOVO IdeaTab A2107A-H)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoIdeaTab A2107A-H Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Version 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoIdeaTab A2107mobile-browseryescloseclose0.285 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0LenovoIdeaTabsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 2.2closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoIdeaTab A2107A-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 2.2 Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.3LenovoIdeaTab A2107tabletyescloseclose0.10701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.051 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:12 | by ThaDafinser